Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Sprintlio

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

5.6

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has more recently extended into retrospectives — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It now bundles 600+ icebreakers, anonymous voting, AI-generated summaries and sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps in a flat <strong>per-space</strong> workspace, though the retro experience is younger and less battle-tested than its estimation roots.

Full review →
Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

2.9

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 5.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Sprintlio scores 2.9 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 5.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
Sprintlio
Ease of Use 5.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 1.0
Detail Kollabe Sprintlio
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 10 members per room, ~4 meetings/month, 7-day history No free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site
Starting price $29/mo $50/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $87/mo Quote-only — contact sales
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2023 2018
HQ Sydney, Australia Toronto, Canada
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 25 12
Integrations 4 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Kollabe Sprintlio
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants
  • + Direct sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps
  • + Public API and MCP server access on Premium

Kollabe — cons

  • No Slack or Microsoft Teams integration
  • No SOC 2 / no advertised GDPR posture — weak for enterprise procurement
  • No dedicated health-check, team-radar or longitudinal pulse feature
  • Solo-founder operation; SSO/SAML and SLA gated behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • Free tier capped at ~4 meetings/month with 7-day history

Sprintlio — pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
← All comparisons