Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs Lucidspark

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.4

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a limited free plan and flat per-team paid pricing.

Full review →
Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant and tight Lucidchart integration — voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, private-mode brainstorming, anonymous voting sessions, timers, the Lucid AI assistant (prompt-to-board, clustering, summaries) and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier; Breakout Boards and the Jira/Azure DevOps card sync are Enterprise-only. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP, IRAP, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor. Lucidspark leads on AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights3.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations6.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
DetailGoRetroLucidspark
CategoryRetrospectivesWhiteboard
Team sizeAnyMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFree plan: 1 team, 5 public boards, 2 team boards per 31-day cycle, unlimited users and guests, 20+ templates. Excludes exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls and icebreakers.3 editable boards, unlimited shapes per board, basic Visual Activities, presentation mode and Lucid AI — no voting, timer or facilitator tools
Starting price$29/team/mo$9/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually)$240/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $10/user)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202010
HQIsraelSouth Jordan, US
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia
LanguagesEnglish only10 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · ImageImage · PDF · CSV · JSON
Features3538
Integrations27

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityGoRetroLucidspark
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnote
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnotenote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

GoRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($29/team/mo) with unlimited members per team, plus a free plan for one team
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with per-board anonymity toggles (hide author, hide cards, hide votes)
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — cons

  • <strong>No published product updates since 2023</strong> — changelog last moved 23 May 2023, blog 28 Jul 2023
  • Free plan is thin: exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls and icebreakers are all Premium-gated
  • Integration breadth is narrow — Jira and Slack only, with no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and a meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No public API or webhooks; async is a multi-day feedback deadline, not a structured async flow, and there is no scheduling or recurring retros

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + <em>Private mode</em> hides sticky note authors until the session ends, and a voting session can be set fully anonymous
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP, IRAP, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Official Lucid MCP server is GA and shipping monthly — search boards, summarise them, generate synced Jira cards from Claude or ChatGPT
  • + Lucid AI is included on every tier today, free plan included

Lucidspark — cons

  • Voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the $10/user Team tier — the free plan's three boards can't run a facilitated retro
  • Breakout Boards and the Lucid Cards sync to Jira/Azure DevOps are Enterprise-only
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI is general brainstorming/clustering, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • Retro template depth trails Miro and Mural, and the REST API needs a Team or Enterprise account

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.