Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.3

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, drawing-on-cards (August 2025), and 2026 updates including hide-column controls and on-the-fly timer controls (pause/resume, +1 minute).

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.1

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, icebreaker games, background music and a clean facilitation flow. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailEasyRetroTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit2 public boards/month (max 2 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, unlimited participants1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price$25/mo£26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)£72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162020
HQBrazilUK
Data residency
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraEmail · Jira
Features2535
Integrations57

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroTeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnotenote
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size
  • + Still actively maintained — hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls shipped in 2026, and the web app was rebuilt from AngularJS onto Vue mid-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); data sits in US Central with no EU residency option, SAML SSO starts at the $90/mo tier, and there's no SCIM
  • Free plan allows 2 public boards per month, keeps only 2 boards on the dashboard (archived ones included), and excludes teams and team boards entirely

TeleRetro — pros

  • + The deepest <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong> of any tool here — GIF and emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros, with 20+ ready templates and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Genuinely cheap for a small org — £72/mo covers 3 teams with unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • Only Slack is documented as a native integration; Jira is claimed on the vendor's comparison pages but absent from its own integrations page, and everything else routes through Zapier
  • Actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em>, and nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it
  • AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only
  • No product update shipped since August 2025 — the marketing site is actively maintained, the changelog is not

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.