EasyRetro
5.3Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives
EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, drawing-on-cards (August 2025), and 2026 updates including hide-column controls and on-the-fly timer controls (pause/resume, +1 minute).
Full review →
LetRetro
5.6The retro tool that thinks with your team
LetRetro is a young, AI-forward retrospective platform built around retros wired into sprint data. Its headline differentiator is now shipped rather than promised: an official MCP server lets Claude, Cursor, VS Code and other AI clients read and drive boards directly. Real-time collaborative boards, AI-generated retro documentation, sentiment/trend analysis and a team health checker sit on flat (pooled-seat) pricing rather than per-user, with Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear card linking to close the loop.
Full review →Summary
EasyRetro scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.
LetRetro scores 5.6 overall and is best for developer-leaning agile teams and startups that want AI-assisted retros wired into their sprint data and dev stack — Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear card linking, plus an official MCP server their AI clients can drive — with health and sentiment tracking and no enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.
EasyRetro leads on ease of use, fun factor and enterprise-grade. LetRetro leads on retro toolkit, value, AI & insights and integrations.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, LetRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | EasyRetro | LetRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | 2 public boards/month (max 2 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, unlimited participants | 3 boards, 1 team, 20 pooled seats, 2 AI docs/mo, 5 exports/mo, community support |
| Starting price | $25/mo | $15/mo (Pro, flat) |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually) | $15/mo (Pro — flat plan covers unlimited teams within its 200 pooled-seat cap; 24 users fits) |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2016 | 2025 |
| HQ | Brazil | Bengaluru, India |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 2 (English, Portuguese) | English only |
| Export formats | PDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · Jira | — |
| Features | 25 | 21 |
| Integrations | 5 | 6 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | EasyRetro | LetRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | — |
| AI action items | — | ✓note |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | — | ✓note |
| Polling | ✓note | ✓note |
| Action dashboard | — | ✓note |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓note |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | — | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓note | — |
| Health Checks | — | ✓note |
| Team Kudos | — | — |
| Whiteboard | — | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | ✓ | — |
| GitHub | — | ✓ |
| GitLab | — | ✓ |
| Jira | ✓ | ✓ |
| Linear | — | ✓ |
| Microsoft Teams | ✓note | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | — | ✓ |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓note |
| Trello | ✓ | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓note |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | — | ✓note |
| Public API | — | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | — | ✓note |
EasyRetro — pros
- + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
- + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
- + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
- + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size
- + Still actively maintained — hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls shipped in 2026, and the web app was rebuilt from AngularJS onto Vue mid-2026
EasyRetro — cons
- − No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
- − AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
- − Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
- − Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); data sits in US Central with no EU residency option, SAML SSO starts at the $90/mo tier, and there's no SCIM
- − Free plan allows 2 public boards per month, keeps only 2 boards on the dashboard (archived ones included), and excludes teams and team boards entirely
LetRetro — pros
- + Flat pricing — $15/mo Pro covers unlimited boards and teams within a 200 pooled-seat cap, so a growing org isn't billed per head
- + AI is a genuine focus, not a bolt-on: retro-doc generation, sentiment/trend analysis, key takeaways and improvement suggestions that cut the post-retro write-up burden
- + An <strong>official MCP server actually shipped</strong> in July 2026 — one-command install, 17 tools, 11 clients — so Claude, Cursor or VS Code can read boards and file cards without a bespoke script
- + Dev-stack card linking is real and reasonably deep: Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear, with inline issue editing, comments and one card linked across several providers at once
- + Built-in team health checker and sentiment-over-time trend dashboards — longitudinal signal many cheap retro tools skip
LetRetro — cons
- − Thin enterprise story: Google and Microsoft sign-in but no SAML SSO, SCIM only 'in progress', no audit-log access, no LetRetro-held SOC 2 or ISO 27001; on-premise and SLA sit behind a quote-only Enterprise tier
- − Solo-founder micro-SaaS — the team page lists one person (Dhanush Kandhan, Bengaluru) still recruiting, and independent coverage is almost nil (9 Product Hunt upvotes, 2 reviews) — a real durability risk for procurement
- − The vendor's own pages contradict each other on connectors: the homepage badges Jira, Confluence and Asana 'Coming Soon' while the integrations page and comparison FAQ list all three as live. Verify anything you're depending on
- − Retro toolkit lacks facilitator staples: no confirmed timer, recurring/scheduled retros, parking lot, team agreements or async-first mode — it's built around live, real-time sessions
- − No public REST API and no webhooks, and the export formats behind the metered '5 exports/mo' limit aren't documented anywhere — MCP is the only programmatic route in
Keep comparing
Other EasyRetro comparisons
Other LetRetro comparisons
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.