Retrospective Tools

Sprintlio vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

2.7

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around action follow-through, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.4

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board and — since a mid-2026 expansion — adds an infinite whiteboard, anonymous team-health pulse checks, timers, and an AI facilitator, alongside templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIFs, kudos, polls, and icebreakers. A separate paid Pro listing exists for advanced features.

Full review →

Summary

Sprintlio scores 2.7 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

SprintRetro scores 4.4 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

Sprintlio leads on integrations and open platform. SprintRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, SprintRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 4.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Sprintlio
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade1.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform0.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailSprintlioSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitNo free plan documented on the vendor site; Capterra lists a free version but it isn't corroborated on sprintlio.comFree for unlimited users on a Jira instance (free app listing)
Starting price$50/user/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleQuote-only — contact salesFree (within free tier)
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded2018
HQToronto, CanadaWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · Email · Jira
Features1221
Integrations21

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySprintlioSprintRetro
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnotenote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Sprintlio — pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance (free app listing)
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Expanded fast: now adds an infinite whiteboard, timers, anonymous team-health pulse checks, and an AI facilitator
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • AI facilitation is thin and may be gated behind the paid <strong>Pro</strong> listing (~$210/yr for 25 Jira users) — the feature split between free and Pro isn't clearly documented
  • No async mode, presentation mode, drag-and-drop grouping, or scheduled/recurring retros
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025); ~682 free-app installs — fine for one team, less proven at scale

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.