Retrospective Tools

Retrium vs RetroTeam

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrium logo

Retrium

5.1

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

5.3

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →

Summary

Retrium scores 5.1 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

RetroTeam scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Retrium leads on retro toolkit, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on value and AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, RetroTeam edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retrium
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 6.5
RetroTeam
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 6.5
Integrations 2.5
Enterprise-grade 1.5
Detail Retrium RetroTeam
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits
Starting price $39/mo $10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $117/mo $30/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2014 2022
HQ Washington, D.C., USA
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 23 18
Integrations 2 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Retrium RetroTeam
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard note
Custom templates note
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through late March 2026
  • + Custom template builder for teams that outgrow the four presets

RetroTeam — cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates (custom builder fills the gap, but no template library)
← All comparisons