Retrospective Tools

Retrium vs RetroFlow

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrium logo

Retrium

5.0

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool built around a guided five-phase facilitation flow, anonymous brainstorming, dot voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks. Since August 2026 the vendor has also run Retrium Next, a separate free open beta that rebuilds the retro around an AI co-facilitator.

Full review →
RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.4

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 11 ready-made templates plus a custom board builder, anonymous feedback, unrestricted upvoting, drag-to-move between columns, action items and PDF/Excel export. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features. The board is desktop-only — any viewport under 768px is blocked outright.

Full review →

Summary

Retrium scores 5.0 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

RetroFlow scores 3.4 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams on laptops who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there is no timer, no phone support, no integrations, no AI and no enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

Retrium leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on value and fun factor.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Retrium edges ahead with an overall score of 5.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights2.5
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailRetriumRetroFlow
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitNo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team RadarEverything is free — all 11 templates, custom boards, saved layouts, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, unlimited upvoting, action items and PDF/Excel export, with no account required to join a board and no paid tier to upgrade to
Starting price$39/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$117/moFree (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2014—
HQWashington, D.C., USA—
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · JiraPDF · Excel
Features308
Integrations20

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetriumRetroFlow
Features
Custom templates✓✓note
Anonymous input✓✓note
Health Checks✓—
Action tracking✓✓note
Async mode✓note—
Whiteboard——
Independent voting✓✓note
Polling——
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓note—
AI action items✓note—
AI Summaries——
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓note—
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓note—
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓—
GDPR✓—
SSO / SAML✓note—
SCIM provisioning✓note—
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API——
Webhooks——
MCP server——

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow — think, group, vote, discuss, wrap-up
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design, with a documented Fishbone root-cause format
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — ten prebuilt radars plus a custom-spoke template, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing at <strong>$39/mo</strong> with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • − No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique and SSO are excluded from it
  • − Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • − AI exists only in <strong>Retrium Next</strong>, a separate free open beta with no data migration, no uptime commitment and no pricing yet — the product you actually pay for has none
  • − The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV, TXT and send-to-Jira
  • − The shipping product has published no release notes since <strong>August 2024</strong>, and the Continuous Improvement Journey beta closed in December 2023

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join in one click and notes sync live
  • + Eleven ready-made formats plus a Custom Board builder (2-6 columns, 7 palettes, 48 emoji) with reusable saved layouts
  • + <strong>Unrestricted voting</strong> — no vote budget, no phase gate, and you can upvote your own cards; cards also drag between columns
  • + PDF and Excel export of the finished board — the only route to getting your data out, and it works

RetroFlow — cons

  • − No timer or phase controls — <em>still</em> nothing in the shipped app, and two timer requests raised in July 2026 sit unshipped as <em>Planned</em> on the vendor's own public roadmap
  • − <strong>Desktop-only</strong> — every board route hard-blocks viewports under 768px with a 'Whoa, tiny screen detected' overlay, even though the marketing FAQ promises a fully responsive phone experience
  • − No grouping of similar cards, no in-column reordering and no carry-over of previous action items; the 'Present' button is still badged SOON
  • − No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack or Teams, and there is no public API, webhooks or AI
  • − No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • − Solo-developer project with no support team, SLA, SOC 2, SSO or GDPR statement — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number and LinkedIn DMs, and the free-tier backend still shows a ~10s cold start plus a first-load error

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.