Retrospective Tools

Mural vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Mural logo

Mural

6.6

Visual collaboration whiteboard with a mature facilitation toolkit and AI-assisted sessions

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, anonymous voting, timers, Private Mode, hundreds of workshop templates (eight of them retro-specific), AI clustering, summary and emotional-tone classification, and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode) refined for over a decade. Best-in-class enterprise posture: SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and NA/EU/APAC data residency.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.1

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, icebreaker games, background music and a clean facilitation flow. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

Mural scores 6.6 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

Mural leads on AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Mural edges ahead with an overall score of 6.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Mural
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations7.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailMuralTeleRetro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitUnlimited murals but only the 3 most recently created stay editable (older go view-only); unlimited members and visitors; no Mural AI1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price$9.99/user/mo£26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo billed annually£72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20112020
HQSan Francisco, USUK
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Asia-Pacific
Languages9 (English, Spanish, German, …)14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsImage · PDF · PowerPoint · HTML · CSVEmail · Jira
Features3935
Integrations87

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMuralTeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnotenote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnotenote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnotenote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notionnotenote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode — refined over 10+ years
  • + Anonymous where it counts: votes hide who voted, and Private Mode can keep sticky authors hidden even after reveal
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, NA/EU/APAC residency
  • + Two-way Jira and Azure DevOps sync via interactive work-item cards turns sticky notes into tracked issues
  • + Polished UX, especially for facilitators running synchronous workshops

Mural — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • AI (clustering, summary, tone Classify) helps inside a session but doesn't track trends across retros
  • SSO/SAML needs the $17.99/user/mo Business tier; SCIM, audit logs and data residency are Enterprise-only

TeleRetro — pros

  • + The deepest <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong> of any tool here — GIF and emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros, with 20+ ready templates and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Genuinely cheap for a small org — £72/mo covers 3 teams with unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • Only Slack is documented as a native integration; Jira is claimed on the vendor's comparison pages but absent from its own integrations page, and everything else routes through Zapier
  • Actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em>, and nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it
  • AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only
  • No product update shipped since August 2025 — the marketing site is actively maintained, the changelog is not

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.