Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs NimbleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.1

Now rebranded as Ludi — the playful retro whiteboard lives on under a new name

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. In 2024 the product was rebranded: metroretro.io now redirects to ludi.co, and the maker (Deqo Software Limited) positions Ludi as the continuation — 'Metro Retro is now Ludi.' If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Ludi; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.0

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Ideate, Group, Vote, Discuss, and Feedback stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Mobile apps for iOS and Android complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.1 overall and is best for searchers looking for Metro Retro — the product now exists as Ludi. Use Ludi (or a dedicated retro tool) instead. It offers custom pricing.

NimbleRetro scores 3.0 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from $7/user/mo.

Metro Retro leads on fun factor. NimbleRetro leads on ease of use and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Metro Retro edges ahead with an overall score of 3.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use 5.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
NimbleRetro
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 3.0
Detail Metro Retro NimbleRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No No
Free limit Free trial only; no permanent free tier publicly disclosed for the retro module
Starting price Free $7/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people N/A — rebranded as Ludi; see the Ludi listing Quote-only — contact sales
Enterprise No Yes
Founded
HQ United Kingdom Bengaluru, India
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 7 13
Integrations 0 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Metro Retro NimbleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard note
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks note

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it's now called Ludi
  • + Carried its playful templates, timer, GIFs and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired (the domain now redirects to ludi.co)
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — Ludi is a 30-day trial then paid
  • Light on the agile stack: no Jira/Slack/Teams integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2, no AI
  • Not a dedicated retro platform — it's a general whiteboard you adapt for retros

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + GDPR compliant; sits under NimbleWork's ISO 27001 / SOC umbrella at the platform level

NimbleRetro — cons

  • Only four templates with limited customisation of stages
  • No SSO/SAML, SCIM, or SOC 2 Type 2 attestation specific to the retro product
  • No retro-specific AI (clustering, summaries, sentiment) despite NimbleWork marketing the wider platform as AI-powered
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Pricing not transparently published; demo-gated
← All comparisons