LetRetro
5.6The retro tool that thinks with your team
LetRetro is a young, AI-forward retrospective platform built around retros wired into sprint data. Its headline differentiator is now shipped rather than promised: an official MCP server lets Claude, Cursor, VS Code and other AI clients read and drive boards directly. Real-time collaborative boards, AI-generated retro documentation, sentiment/trend analysis and a team health checker sit on flat (pooled-seat) pricing rather than per-user, with Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear card linking to close the loop.
Full review →
SprintRetro
5.0Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira
SprintRetro is a free Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, scope change, carryover, cycle time, committed vs delivered) into a collaborative retro board, and the free listing also carries an infinite whiteboard, anonymous team-health pulse checks, timers, and an AI facilitator, alongside templates, anonymous voting, cross-sprint action tracking that can create Jira issues, GIFs, kudos, polls, and icebreakers. Both Marketplace listings are Cloud Fortified. A separate paid Pro app sits alongside the free one.
Full review →Summary
LetRetro scores 5.6 overall and is best for developer-leaning agile teams and startups that want AI-assisted retros wired into their sprint data and dev stack — Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear card linking, plus an official MCP server their AI clients can drive — with health and sentiment tracking and no enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.
SprintRetro scores 5.0 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.
LetRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and open platform. SprintRetro leads on fun factor and enterprise-grade.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, LetRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | LetRetro | SprintRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | 3 boards, 1 team, 20 pooled seats, 2 AI docs/mo, 5 exports/mo, community support | Free for unlimited users on a Jira instance (free app listing) |
| Starting price | $15/mo (Pro, flat) | $8.40/user/yr (Pro app; free on Jira sites of 10 or fewer users) |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $15/mo (Pro — flat plan covers unlimited teams within its 200 pooled-seat cap; 24 users fits) | Free (within free tier) |
| Enterprise | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2025 | — |
| HQ | Bengaluru, India | Waterlooville, United Kingdom |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | — | Jira |
| Features | 21 | 27 |
| Integrations | 6 | 1 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | LetRetro | SprintRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | ✓ |
| AI action items | ✓note | ✓ |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | ✓note | ✓note |
| Polling | ✓note | ✓ |
| Action dashboard | ✓note | ✓note |
| Custom templates | ✓note | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | — | — |
| Agile Estimations | — | — |
| Health Checks | ✓note | ✓note |
| Team Kudos | — | ✓ |
| Whiteboard | — | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | ✓ | — |
| GitLab | ✓ | — |
| Jira | ✓ | ✓ |
| Linear | ✓ | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | ✓ | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓note | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | ✓note |
| GDPR | ✓note | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓note |
| On-premises | ✓note | — |
| Public API | — | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | ✓note | — |
LetRetro — pros
- + Flat pricing — $15/mo Pro covers unlimited boards and teams within a 200 pooled-seat cap, so a growing org isn't billed per head
- + AI is a genuine focus, not a bolt-on: retro-doc generation, sentiment/trend analysis, key takeaways and improvement suggestions that cut the post-retro write-up burden
- + An <strong>official MCP server actually shipped</strong> in July 2026 — one-command install, 17 tools, 11 clients — so Claude, Cursor or VS Code can read boards and file cards without a bespoke script
- + Dev-stack card linking is real and reasonably deep: Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear, with inline issue editing, comments and one card linked across several providers at once
- + Built-in team health checker and sentiment-over-time trend dashboards — longitudinal signal many cheap retro tools skip
LetRetro — cons
- − Thin enterprise story: Google and Microsoft sign-in but no SAML SSO, SCIM only 'in progress', no audit-log access, no LetRetro-held SOC 2 or ISO 27001; on-premise and SLA sit behind a quote-only Enterprise tier
- − Solo-founder micro-SaaS — the team page lists one person (Dhanush Kandhan, Bengaluru) still recruiting, and independent coverage is almost nil (9 Product Hunt upvotes, 2 reviews) — a real durability risk for procurement
- − The vendor's own pages contradict each other on connectors: the homepage badges Jira, Confluence and Asana 'Coming Soon' while the integrations page and comparison FAQ list all three as live. Verify anything you're depending on
- − Retro toolkit lacks facilitator staples: no confirmed timer, recurring/scheduled retros, parking lot, team agreements or async-first mode — it's built around live, real-time sessions
- − No public REST API and no webhooks, and the export formats behind the metered '5 exports/mo' limit aren't documented anywhere — MCP is the only programmatic route in
SprintRetro — pros
- + Genuinely free for unlimited users on your Jira instance — the paid Pro app is optional, not the entry point
- + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, scope change, carryover, cycle time, committed vs delivered) into the retro itself
- + Strong action loop: unfinished actions carry into the next retro, get quality-scored, and can be pushed into Jira as issues
- + <strong>Cloud Fortified</strong> on the Atlassian Marketplace — bug bounty, reliability SLOs, and a one-business-day response commitment on critical tickets
- + Built on Forge: no separate login, and the vendor states no third-party API calls or external data sharing
SprintRetro — cons
- − Jira Cloud only — every participant needs a Jira licence, and there's no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, or standalone web app
- − <em>No board export at all</em> — no PDF, CSV, or image download; the only data that leaves is a Jira issue
- − No async mode, presentation mode, drag-and-drop grouping, or scheduled/recurring retros
- − No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own — the trust centre shows framework logos with no status label and no attestation report behind them; no SCIM, audit logs, or cross-team reporting either
- − Free-versus-Pro split is undocumented: both Marketplace listings advertise the same feature set, and Pro is never mentioned on sprintretro.co
Keep comparing
Other LetRetro comparisons
Other SprintRetro comparisons
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.