Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

3.1

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board: pick one of five presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos) or name your own 1-10 sections, share the URL, add ideas anonymously, upvote, and export to PDF or Excel. The app still works and is still in daily use, but development stopped years ago — the public source repository's last feature commits date to April 2020 and the Terms have not been revised since.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

5.8

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, icebreaker games, background music and a clean facilitation flow. Participants join by link with no account. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, and prices per team rather than per user, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 3.1 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

IdeaBoardz leads on value. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.5
Retro Toolkit3.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights1.5
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailIdeaBoardzTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFully free, no paid tier1 team, 3 retros total (deleted retros still count), 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting priceFree£26/mo (Team plan, 1 team, unlimited members; £21/mo billed annually)
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)£72/mo (~$97/mo) on the Business plan — 3 teams, unlimited members; £58/mo billed annually
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded20102020
HQPune, IndiaUK
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish only14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsPDF · ExcelEmail · Image · JSON
Features1036
Integrations010

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityIdeaBoardzTeleRetro
Features
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action trackingnote
Async modenote
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Polling
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooks
MCP server

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free — no paywall, no paid tier, no trial clock
  • + No signup required to participate — just share the URL
  • + Five one-click presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos), or type your own 1-10 section titles
  • + Drag one sticky onto another to merge them; the votes are added together
  • + PDF and Excel export on every board, plus a working phone view

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • The presets only pre-fill column titles — there is no timer, no phases and no facilitator flow behind them
  • No action-item tracking, no owners, no due dates, no carry-over between boards
  • Unlimited anonymous upvotes with no per-person vote budget
  • Zero integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2 and no published privacy policy — the URL is the only access control
  • No product work since April 2020; support is a Gmail address and a Twitter handle

TeleRetro — pros

  • + The deepest <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong> of any tool here — GIF and emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, Spotlight to focus the room on one note, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros — 16 fully anonymous templates, custom models, and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Flat per-team pricing with <em>no per-user charge</em> — £72/mo covers 3 teams, unlimited members and unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • Slack is the only native integration; the in-app integrations panel offers Slack and Zapier and nothing else, despite Jira appearing on the vendor's comparison pages
  • No way to schedule a future retro or set one to recur, and actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em> — nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it either
  • AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • Export is thin: an emailed summary, a PNG of the summary screen, and an org-metrics JSON dump. No CSV, PDF or Excel
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.