Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.8

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 200-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, board-column generation from a theme prompt and meeting summaries — plus numeric-scale and multiple-choice surveys, dashboard bulk actions, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

5.0

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool built around a guided five-phase facilitation flow, anonymous brainstorming, dot voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks. Since August 2026 the vendor has also run Retrium Next, a separate free open beta that rebuilds the retro around an AI co-facilitator.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 5.0 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and open platform. Retrium leads on retro toolkit and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights2.5
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailEasyRetroRetrium
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesNo
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV exportNo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar
Starting price$25/mo$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162014
HQBrazilWashington, D.C., USA
Data residencyUnited States
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraCSV · Jira
Features3430
Integrations52

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroRetrium
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action tracking
Async modenote
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Polling
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Survey engine got serious in June 2026: single-choice, multiple-choice and numeric-scale polls with Team Health Check, Team Safety, mood and meeting-value templates
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: five changelog entries in 2026, most recently organisation audit logs in July

EasyRetro — cons

  • The health surveys are one question on one board — no health model, no cadence, no trend line across sprints
  • Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • No public API, no webhooks and no MCP server — automation stops at the export button
  • Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow — think, group, vote, discuss, wrap-up
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design, with a documented Fishbone root-cause format
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — ten prebuilt radars plus a custom-spoke template, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing at <strong>$39/mo</strong> with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique and SSO are excluded from it
  • Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • AI exists only in <strong>Retrium Next</strong>, a separate free open beta with no data migration, no uptime commitment and no pricing yet — the product you actually pay for has none
  • The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV, TXT and send-to-Jira
  • The shipping product has published no release notes since <strong>August 2024</strong>, and the Continuous Improvement Journey beta closed in December 2023

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.