Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Echometer

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.3

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, drawing-on-cards (August 2025), and 2026 updates including hide-column controls and on-the-fly timer controls (pause/resume, +1 minute).

Full review →
Echometer logo

Echometer

5.3

Psychology-backed retros and team health checks for engineering teams

Echometer is a German retrospective and 1:1 meeting platform built around recurring health-check pulses, structured retros, and longitudinal team development tracking. It pitches itself to engineering managers, scrum masters and agile coaches who want research-grounded surveys rather than a blank whiteboard.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Echometer scores 5.3 overall and is best for engineering managers and agile coaches who want recurring health-check pulses tied to retros, with EU data residency and a research-flavoured question library. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, fun factor, integrations and open platform. Echometer leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

EasyRetro and Echometer are evenly matched overall. The right choice comes down to which dimensions matter most to your team.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
Echometer
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit8.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor5.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
DetailEasyRetroEchometer
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit2 public boards/month (max 2 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, unlimited participantsStarter: 1 team, 25 workspace members, unlimited retro guests, 1 retro/month after trial, 2-retro archive per team
Starting price$25/mo€29/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)€87/mo billed annually (3 teams × €29 Pro)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162019
HQBrazilMünster, Germany
Data residencyGermany
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)2 (English, German)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraPDF · Markdown · Email
Features2543
Integrations51

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroEchometer
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size
  • + Still actively maintained — hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls shipped in 2026, and the web app was rebuilt from AngularJS onto Vue mid-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); data sits in US Central with no EU residency option, SAML SSO starts at the $90/mo tier, and there's no SCIM
  • Free plan allows 2 public boards per month, keeps only 2 boards on the dashboard (archived ones included), and excludes teams and team boards entirely

Echometer — pros

  • + 200+ research-grounded health-check items, custom models and automated pulse rotation
  • + Longitudinal team radars, heatmaps and workspace dashboards tied to retros
  • + EU-only data residency (Open Telekom Cloud, Germany) with GDPR DPA
  • + Open actions resurface automatically in the next retro, with email reminders to owners
  • + Per-team pricing — €87/mo covers three teams of eight, billed annually

Echometer — cons

  • Thin integrations — Jira and calendar sync only; no Slack, Teams or Confluence
  • No public API or webhooks; export is PDF and Markdown only
  • No SOC 2 — the ISO 27001 certificate covers the datacenter, not Echometer itself
  • Retro-side AI stops at suggesting measures; transcript coaching is a separately-priced 1:1 product
  • No scheduled or recurring retros — you copy a past format and start each session manually

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.