Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Echometer

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.8

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 200-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, board-column generation from a theme prompt and meeting summaries — plus numeric-scale and multiple-choice surveys, dashboard bulk actions, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
Echometer logo

Echometer

5.3

Psychology-backed retros and team health checks for engineering teams

Echometer is a German retrospective, health-check and 1:1 meeting platform built around recurring pulse surveys, structured retros and longitudinal team development tracking. It pitches itself to busy team leads — engineering managers, scrum masters and agile coaches — who want research-grounded question libraries rather than a blank whiteboard.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Echometer scores 5.3 overall and is best for engineering managers and agile coaches who want recurring health-check pulses tied to retros, with EU data residency and a research-flavoured question library. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and open platform. Echometer leads on retro toolkit and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Echometer
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit8.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor5.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
DetailEasyRetroEchometer
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV exportStarter: 1 team, 25 workspace members, unlimited retro guests, 1 retro/month after trial, 2-retro archive per team
Starting price$25/mo€29/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)€87/mo billed annually (3 teams × €29 Pro)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162019
HQBrazilMünster, Germany
Data residencyUnited StatesGermany
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)2 (English, German)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraPDF · Markdown · Email
Features3444
Integrations51

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroEchometer
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action tracking
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Polling
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Survey engine got serious in June 2026: single-choice, multiple-choice and numeric-scale polls with Team Health Check, Team Safety, mood and meeting-value templates
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: five changelog entries in 2026, most recently organisation audit logs in July

EasyRetro — cons

  • The health surveys are one question on one board — no health model, no cadence, no trend line across sprints
  • Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • No public API, no webhooks and no MCP server — automation stops at the export button
  • Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

Echometer — pros

  • + 200+ research-grounded health-check items, custom models and auto-scheduled pulse surveys
  • + Longitudinal team radars, heatmaps and a cross-team workspace dashboard tied to retros
  • + German-only hosting (Open Telekom Cloud, Magdeburg/Biere) with a GDPR data processing agreement
  • + Open actions resurface automatically in the next retro, with owner email reminders and one-click push to Jira
  • + Per-team, not per-seat, pricing — €87/mo covers three teams of eight, billed annually

Echometer — cons

  • Integrations stop at Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or Linear
  • No public API or webhooks; export is PDF, Markdown and an emailed recap
  • No SOC 2 — the ISO 27001 certificate covers the datacenter, not Echometer itself
  • Retro-side AI is one function: suggested measures. No clustering, no AI session summary
  • No scheduled or recurring retros — you copy a past format and start each session manually

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.