Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Echometer

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.7

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
Echometer logo

Echometer

6.1

Psychology-backed retros and team health checks for engineering teams

Echometer is a German retrospective and 1:1 meeting platform built around recurring health-check pulses, structured retros, and longitudinal team development tracking. It pitches itself to engineering managers, scrum masters and agile coaches who want <strong>research-grounded surveys</strong> rather than a blank whiteboard.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Echometer scores 6.1 overall and is best for engineering managers and agile coaches who want recurring health-check pulses tied to retros, with EU data residency and a research-flavoured question library. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, fun factor and integrations. Echometer leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Echometer edges ahead with an overall score of 6.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Echometer
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Detail EasyRetro Echometer
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Mid-market
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no team Starter: 1 team, 25 workspace members, 1 retro/month after trial, 6-month archive
Starting price $25/mo €35/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members) $96/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2016 2019
HQ Brazil Münster, Germany
Data residency Germany
Languages 2 (English, Portuguese) 2 (English, German)
Features 24 44
Integrations 5 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability EasyRetro Echometer
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

Echometer — pros

  • + Health-check question library grounded in University of Münster psychology research
  • + Strong longitudinal pulse and team-radar reporting tied to retros
  • + EU-only data residency (Open Telekom Cloud, Germany) with GDPR DPA
  • + AI Co-Pilot clusters ideas and proposes SMART action items

Echometer — cons

  • Thin chatops integrations — no native Slack, Teams or Confluence
  • No SOC 2; relies on ISO 27001 datacenters and EU residency
  • 1:1 meetings and the deepest AI live in a separate paid product
  • No native scheduling or recurring retros — sessions start manually
← All comparisons