Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.8

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs a time-boxed retro through Icebreaker, Ideate, Group, Vote, Discuss and Feedback stages, ending in a 5-Why root cause drill-down on whatever the team voted up. Action items created in the Discuss stage convert directly into Nimble work items (user stories, cards) in the project the retro was created from. There is no separate purchase — Retrospectives ship to every Public SaaS Nimble account by default.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

5.7

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke was rebuilt from scratch as v3 in August 2026: retro boards, static and agent-run surveys, a Signals engine that detects morale, burnout and psychological-safety patterns in feedback text, and an Ask layer that answers questions with cited evidence. An official OAuth MCP server is included on every tier, including Free.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.8 overall and is best for small agile teams already inside the Nimble suite that want a structured, time-boxed retro ending in a real root cause analysis, with the follow-up landing in the same backlog they already work from. It offers paid plans from $15/mo (up to 20 users).

ScatterSpoke scores 5.7 overall and is best for engineering orgs that want AI to synthesise feedback across many teams and surveys — and agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

NimbleRetro leads on value. ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 5.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use5.5
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform5.0
Enterprise-grade5.5
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value3.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights9.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailNimbleRetroScatterSpoke
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierNoYes
Free limitFree trial only; no permanent free tier published for the retro module. A $0 Nimble suite plan (10 users / 10 projects) appears in a secondary table on the suite pricing page, but Retrospectives appear neither there nor in the suite's full feature-comparison table1 seat; unlimited static surveys and responses; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; 5 of 15 signal rules; MCP connection but no reading results over it
Starting price$15/mo (up to 20 users)$29/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (24 users x $10/user/mo Nimble Team tier); NimbleRetro's own $15/mo plan caps at 20 users and no larger standalone tier is published$814/mo on Business (includes 5 seats; 19 extra seats at $35/seat/mo) — Pro is capped at 5 seats
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20022019
HQCupertino, CA, United StatesUSA
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · PDF
Features1946
Integrations43

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNimbleRetroScatterSpoke
Features
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action trackingnote
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLabnote
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2notenote
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooksnote
MCP servernote

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + 5-Why root cause analysis is a <em>built-in retro stage</em>, not an afterthought — almost no other retro tool ships one
  • + Anonymous voting plus a facilitator-set timer on every stage keeps a 60-minute retro on the rails
  • + Action items convert directly into Nimble work items, so follow-up lands in the same backlog the team already works from
  • + Included by default in every Public SaaS Nimble account — no separate purchase, no tier upgrade, available to all user roles
  • + NimbleWork runs annual SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 audits, supports SAMLv2/ADFSv3 SSO, and publishes a separate EU data region

NimbleRetro — cons

  • The dedicated NimbleRetro iOS and Android apps have been delisted from both the App Store and Google Play, while the product pages still advertise them
  • No health checks, no recurring retros, no async mode, and no documented export of a retro board in any format
  • The platform surface — REST API, outgoing webhooks and the new Nimble MCP server — reaches Nimble cards only; none of it touches a retro, and no AI runs on retro data despite the Retrium comparison page ticking <em>Generative AI</em>
  • Participants are limited to members of the Nimble project the retro was created from, and the module is unavailable outside Public SaaS
  • No rate card: the only NimbleRetro-specific price NimbleWork publishes ($15/mo for up to 20 users) sits on a blog post, and the retro 'pricing' page is a product page with a demo form

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier including Free — OAuth, no API keys to mint; reading results is where the paid line sits
  • + Signals engine with fifteen built-in rules and a detect-then-critique pass before anything is recorded
  • + Ask names the survey or retro behind every answer, and cross-retro theme trends ship on paid plans
  • + Unusually precise public docs — a per-tier entitlement table that names exactly what each plan gates
  • + Guest join by verified email or open link, and guests never consume a seat

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • $814/mo for 3 teams of 8 on Business (5 seats included, then $35/seat); Free is a single seat
  • <strong>Action items are no longer part of the v3 retro flow</strong> — the Review phase records outcomes as card comments
  • Manual grouping was removed; clustering is AI-only and board columns are fixed at creation
  • The v3 integration entitlement covers only Slack, Teams and email — no Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps setup is documented
  • One CSV export from a closed retro; audit logs, data retention and org-wide AI are Enterprise-only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.