Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.6

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Icebreaker, Ideation, Grouping, Voting, and Root Cause Analysis stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Native iOS and Android apps complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems (user stories and cards).

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

4.7

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.6 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from $10/user/mo (Nimble Team tier, USD; standalone NimbleRetro is quote-only).

Retrium scores 4.7 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

NimbleRetro leads on open platform. Retrium leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Retrium edges ahead with an overall score of 4.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade5.5
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailNimbleRetroRetrium
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierNoNo
Free limitFree trial only; no permanent free tier published for the retro module. A $0 Nimble suite plan (10 users / 10 projects) appears in a secondary table on the suite pricing page, but it does not list Retrospectives among its featuresNo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar
Starting price$10/user/mo (Nimble Team tier, USD; standalone NimbleRetro is quote-only)$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (24 users x $10/user/mo Nimble Team tier); standalone NimbleRetro is quote-only$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20022014
HQCupertino, CA, United StatesWashington, D.C., USA
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · Jira
Features1626
Integrations22

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNimbleRetroRetrium
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnotenote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooksnote
MCP server

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + NimbleWork runs an annual SOC 2 Type II audit and an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 audit, with SAMLv2/ADFSv3 SSO at the platform level
  • + Action items convert directly into Nimble work items, so follow-up lands in the same backlog the team already works from

NimbleRetro — cons

  • Only four templates, and custom templates cap out at four columns
  • No SCIM provisioning or audit logs documented; SSO and the SOC 2 / ISO 27001 attestations sit at the NimbleWork platform level, not the retro module
  • Comparison pages tick 'Generative AI' for NimbleRetro, but no retro AI (clustering, summaries, sentiment) is documented — NimbleWork's AI Agents are a separately licensed add-on aimed at Nimble cards and analytics
  • No documented export of a retro board in any format
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Participants are limited to members of the Nimble project the retro is created from
  • NimbleRetro's own pricing page is demo-gated; the only published rate card is the Nimble suite's ($10/user/mo Team, $26/user/mo Business)

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — up to seven customisable spokes, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique stays paid-only during it
  • Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or sentiment
  • The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV and TXT
  • No published product updates since <strong>August 2024</strong> — the help centre's yearly updates series ends at 2024

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.