Retrospective Tools

Mural vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Mural logo

Mural

6.6

Visual collaboration whiteboard with a mature facilitation toolkit and AI-assisted sessions

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, anonymous voting, timers, Private Mode, hundreds of workshop templates (eight of them retro-specific), AI clustering, summary and emotional-tone classification, and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode) refined for over a decade. Best-in-class enterprise posture: SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and NA/EU/APAC data residency.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

4.7

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

Mural scores 6.6 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 4.7 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

Mural leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Retrium leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Mural edges ahead with an overall score of 6.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Mural
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations7.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailMuralRetrium
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierYesNo
Free limitUnlimited murals but only the 3 most recently created stay editable (older go view-only); unlimited members and visitors; no Mural AINo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar
Starting price$9.99/user/mo$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo billed annually$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20112014
HQSan Francisco, USWashington, D.C., USA
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Asia-Pacific
Languages9 (English, Spanish, German, …)English only
Export formatsImage · PDF · PowerPoint · HTML · CSVCSV · Jira
Features3926
Integrations82

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMuralRetrium
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnotenote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode — refined over 10+ years
  • + Anonymous where it counts: votes hide who voted, and Private Mode can keep sticky authors hidden even after reveal
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, NA/EU/APAC residency
  • + Two-way Jira and Azure DevOps sync via interactive work-item cards turns sticky notes into tracked issues
  • + Polished UX, especially for facilitators running synchronous workshops

Mural — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • AI (clustering, summary, tone Classify) helps inside a session but doesn't track trends across retros
  • SSO/SAML needs the $17.99/user/mo Business tier; SCIM, audit logs and data residency are Enterprise-only

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — up to seven customisable spokes, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique stays paid-only during it
  • Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or sentiment
  • The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV and TXT
  • No published product updates since <strong>August 2024</strong> — the help centre's yearly updates series ends at 2024

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.