Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs Sprintlio

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.1

Now rebranded as Ludi — the playful retro whiteboard lives on under a new name

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. In 2024 the product was rebranded: metroretro.io now redirects to ludi.co, and the maker (Deqo Software Limited) positions Ludi as the continuation — 'Metro Retro is now Ludi.' If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Ludi; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

2.9

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.1 overall and is best for searchers looking for Metro Retro — the product now exists as Ludi. Use Ludi (or a dedicated retro tool) instead. It offers custom pricing.

Sprintlio scores 2.9 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

Metro Retro leads on fun factor and enterprise-grade. Sprintlio leads on integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Metro Retro edges ahead with an overall score of 3.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use 5.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
Sprintlio
Ease of Use 5.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 1.0
Detail Metro Retro Sprintlio
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No No
Free limit No free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site
Starting price Free $50/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people N/A — rebranded as Ludi; see the Ludi listing Quote-only — contact sales
Enterprise No No
Founded 2018
HQ United Kingdom Toronto, Canada
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 7 12
Integrations 0 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Metro Retro Sprintlio
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it's now called Ludi
  • + Carried its playful templates, timer, GIFs and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired (the domain now redirects to ludi.co)
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — Ludi is a 30-day trial then paid
  • Light on the agile stack: no Jira/Slack/Teams integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2, no AI
  • Not a dedicated retro platform — it's a general whiteboard you adapt for retros

Sprintlio — pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
← All comparisons