Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant and tight Lucidchart integration — voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, private-mode brainstorming, anonymous voting sessions, timers, the Lucid AI assistant (prompt-to-board, clustering, summaries) and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier; Breakout Boards and the Jira/Azure DevOps card sync are Enterprise-only. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP, IRAP, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint from Slack or the web app, then runs the retro on a synced board with drag-and-drop grouping, voting and assignable action items. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the Pro AI plan. No public changelog and no visible feature change since April 2025 — ask for a roadmap before committing.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

Lucidspark leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Retro Rabbit leads on ease of use and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations6.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailLucidsparkRetro Rabbit
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limit3 editable boards, unlimited shapes per board, basic Visual Activities, presentation mode and Lucid AI — no voting, timer or facilitator tools14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$9/user/mo$30/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $10/user)$90/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2010
HQSouth Jordan, USBoston, United States
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia
Languages10 (English, Spanish, German, …)English only
Export formatsImage · PDF · CSV · JSONCSV · Excel · PDF
Features3816
Integrations71

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLucidsparkRetro Rabbit
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + <em>Private mode</em> hides sticky note authors until the session ends, and a voting session can be set fully anonymous
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP, IRAP, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Official Lucid MCP server is GA and shipping monthly — search boards, summarise them, generate synced Jira cards from Claude or ChatGPT
  • + Lucid AI is included on every tier today, free plan included

Lucidspark — cons

  • Voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the $10/user Team tier — the free plan's three boards can't run a facilitated retro
  • Breakout Boards and the Lucid Cards sync to Jira/Azure DevOps are Enterprise-only
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI is general brainstorming/clustering, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • Retro template depth trails Miro and Mural, and the REST API needs a Team or Enterprise account

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — notes get captured in Slack throughout the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously instead of in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag-and-drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ covers grouping, action-item suggestions and retro summaries on the $40/team/mo Pro AI plan
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited users, and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • No public API, webhooks or MCP server — data leaves only as a file export
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, and the privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.