Retrospective Tools

Miro vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Miro logo

Miro

7.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now sold as an AI Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with a 7,000+ template library (300+ retro formats among them), AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Engage live polls and word clouds (included with Business since June 2026), Blueprints for reusable multi-board workflows, real-time and async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace with first-party two-way card sync to Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear and ClickUp. An official MCP server runs on every plan under per-tier daily call quotas.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool: the team drops notes into a Slack channel or the web app all sprint long, then runs the retro on a live synced board with drag-to-group, dot voting, a shared timer and assignable action items that carry over to the next retro. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the $40/team/month Pro AI plan. Four-person vendor, Slack is the only integration, and there is still no public changelog.

Full review →

Summary

Miro scores 7.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want retro notes captured continuously through the sprint and a lightweight live or async board — and that don't need Jira, health checks or a procurement checklist. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

Miro leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Retro Rabbit leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Miro
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform6.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailMiroRetro Rabbit
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeEnterpriseSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limit3 editable boards, limited AI credits, 100 MCP calls/day, full 7,000+ template library, 250+ app marketplace; no private boards, SSO, guests, Blueprints or two-way integrations14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$8/user/mo$30/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$192/mo billed annually (Starter, 24 seats)$90/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2011
HQAmsterdam, NLBoston, United States
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia · JPUnited States
Languages8 (English, Spanish, German, …)English only
Export formatsImage · PDF · CSVCSV · Excel · PDF
Features4024
Integrations121

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMiroRetro Rabbit
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Health Checks
Action trackingnote
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimationsnote
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnotenote
AI Summariesnote
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistantnotenote
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUpnote
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teams
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Miro — pros

  • + Enormous template library (7,000+ board templates, 300+ retro formats) plus the Miroverse community gallery
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by colour, tag, author, keyword and sentiment — real time saved on a 60-sticky board
  • + First-party two-way card sync to Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear and ClickUp, so a sticky becomes tracked work in one click
  • + <strong>Engage</strong> activities — live polls, word clouds, scales, ranking — are included with Business; participants join by QR code with no Miro account
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001 and US/EU/AU/Japan data residency; official MCP server on every plan

Miro — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: 24 people cost $192/mo on Starter (annual). The tier that actually matters for retros — Business, with two-way Jira sync, SSO, guests and Engage — is $480/mo
  • Recent G2 reviewers' loudest complaint is billing, not the canvas: guests converted to paid licences and prorated mid-cycle seat charges
  • No health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team pulse; Engage Scales reads the room once, it doesn't draw a trend line
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover, cross-team rollup or action dashboard — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint, and actions only persist as Jira/Azure DevOps/Linear cards
  • SCIM, audit logs, domain control and data residency are Enterprise-only, and Enterprise starts at 30 seats

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first capture — notes land in the channel throughout the sprint, so the board opens full instead of starting with silent writing
  • + Board covers the basics properly: drag-to-group with editable group names, dot voting with a configurable 1–50 vote budget, a shared pause/resume timer, and a per-user anonymity toggle
  • + Action items carry forward — a dedicated <em>Old / Unresolved Items</em> tab plus per-room and per-person trackers, with Slack reminders to assignees
  • + A GIPHY picker on notes that the marketing site never mentions — the one bit of levity on an otherwise plain board
  • + Flat $30/team/month with unlimited users (3 teams of 8 = $90/mo), and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps, and no public API, webhooks or MCP
  • No health checks, team radars or sentiment tracking; the only longitudinal view is a notes-per-day bar chart per room
  • AI is two calls — a per-retro summary and one action-item suggestion. The site's <em>intelligent note grouping</em> claim has no counterpart in the shipped web app
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO/SAML is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no SOC 2 of its own, the privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments, and the Slack Marketplace listing records <em>has a dedicated security team: no</em>
  • No free tier and no public changelog, from a four-person vendor whose marketing site has not changed since early 2025

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.