Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Metro Retro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant and tight Lucidchart integration — voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, private-mode brainstorming, anonymous voting sessions, timers, the Lucid AI assistant (prompt-to-board, clustering, summaries) and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier; Breakout Boards and the Jira/Azure DevOps card sync are Enterprise-only. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP, IRAP, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →
Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.0

Rebranded twice — Metro Retro became Ludi, now Spreo; the playful retro whiteboard lives on

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. The product has since been renamed twice by its maker, Deqo Software Limited: to Ludi on 4 August 2025, then to Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a trademark cease-and-desist. The metroretro.io domain now 301-redirects straight to spreo.io. If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Spreo; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Metro Retro scores 3.0 overall and is best for searchers who remember Metro Retro and need to know where it went — the product now ships as <strong>Spreo</strong>. Go there, or to a dedicated retro platform, instead. It offers custom pricing.

Lucidspark leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations6.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
Metro Retro
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailLucidsparkMetro Retro
CategoryWhiteboardWhiteboard
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limit3 editable boards, unlimited shapes per board, basic Visual Activities, presentation mode and Lucid AI — no voting, timer or facilitator tools
Starting price$9/user/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $10/user)N/A — brand retired; see the Spreo listing
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2010
HQSouth Jordan, USUnited Kingdom
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia
Languages10 (English, Spanish, German, …)English only
Export formatsImage · PDF · CSV · JSONPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira
Features387
Integrations70

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLucidsparkMetro Retro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + <em>Private mode</em> hides sticky note authors until the session ends, and a voting session can be set fully anonymous
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP, IRAP, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Official Lucid MCP server is GA and shipping monthly — search boards, summarise them, generate synced Jira cards from Claude or ChatGPT
  • + Lucid AI is included on every tier today, free plan included

Lucidspark — cons

  • Voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the $10/user Team tier — the free plan's three boards can't run a facilitated retro
  • Breakout Boards and the Lucid Cards sync to Jira/Azure DevOps are Enterprise-only
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI is general brainstorming/clustering, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • Retro template depth trails Miro and Mural, and the REST API needs a Team or Enterprise account

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it now ships as Spreo (Metro Retro → Ludi, 4 Aug 2025 → Spreo, 1 Jul 2026)
  • + The vendor says accounts, boards, data and workflows carried through both renames, and old links redirect
  • + Carried its playful templates, session timer and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired — the domain 301-redirects straight to spreo.io
  • Two name changes in under a year (Metro Retro → Ludi → Spreo) leave stranded searchers chasing a moving target; bookmarks, runbooks and SSO configs all need updating
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — a 30-day trial, then paid
  • The old domain isn't a clean redirect everywhere: metroretro.io/pricing returns a stale Spreo <em>Non-prod environment</em> stub instead of forwarding (checked 3 Aug 2026)

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.