Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

3.1

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board: pick one of five presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos) or name your own 1-10 sections, share the URL, add ideas anonymously, upvote, and export to PDF or Excel. The app still works and is still in daily use, but development stopped years ago — the public source repository's last feature commits date to April 2020 and the Terms have not been revised since.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

5.7

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke was rebuilt from scratch as v3 in August 2026: retro boards, static and agent-run surveys, a Signals engine that detects morale, burnout and psychological-safety patterns in feedback text, and an Ask layer that answers questions with cited evidence. An official OAuth MCP server is included on every tier, including Free.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 3.1 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke scores 5.7 overall and is best for engineering orgs that want AI to synthesise feedback across many teams and surveys — and agent builders who need a survey backend over MCP. It offers a free tier.

IdeaBoardz leads on value. ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 5.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.5
Retro Toolkit3.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value3.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights9.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailIdeaBoardzScatterSpoke
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFully free, no paid tier1 seat; unlimited static surveys and responses; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; 5 of 15 signal rules; MCP connection but no reading results over it
Starting priceFree$29/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)$814/mo on Business (includes 5 seats; 19 extra seats at $35/seat/mo) — Pro is capped at 5 seats
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded20102019
HQPune, IndiaUSA
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · ExcelCSV · PDF
Features1046
Integrations03

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityIdeaBoardzScatterSpoke
Features
Custom templatesnotenote
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action trackingnote
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooks
MCP server

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free — no paywall, no paid tier, no trial clock
  • + No signup required to participate — just share the URL
  • + Five one-click presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos), or type your own 1-10 section titles
  • + Drag one sticky onto another to merge them; the votes are added together
  • + PDF and Excel export on every board, plus a working phone view

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • The presets only pre-fill column titles — there is no timer, no phases and no facilitator flow behind them
  • No action-item tracking, no owners, no due dates, no carry-over between boards
  • Unlimited anonymous upvotes with no per-person vote budget
  • Zero integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2 and no published privacy policy — the URL is the only access control
  • No product work since April 2020; support is a Gmail address and a Twitter handle

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + Official MCP server on every tier including Free — OAuth, no API keys to mint; reading results is where the paid line sits
  • + Signals engine with fifteen built-in rules and a detect-then-critique pass before anything is recorded
  • + Ask names the survey or retro behind every answer, and cross-retro theme trends ship on paid plans
  • + Unusually precise public docs — a per-tier entitlement table that names exactly what each plan gates
  • + Guest join by verified email or open link, and guests never consume a seat

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • $814/mo for 3 teams of 8 on Business (5 seats included, then $35/seat); Free is a single seat
  • <strong>Action items are no longer part of the v3 retro flow</strong> — the Review phase records outcomes as card comments
  • Manual grouping was removed; clustering is AI-only and board columns are fixed at creation
  • The v3 integration entitlement covers only Slack, Teams and email — no Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps setup is documented
  • One CSV export from a closed retro; audit logs, data retention and org-wide AI are Enterprise-only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.