Retrospective Tools

Echometer vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Echometer logo

Echometer

5.3

Psychology-backed retros and team health checks for engineering teams

Echometer is a German retrospective and 1:1 meeting platform built around recurring health-check pulses, structured retros, and longitudinal team development tracking. It pitches itself to engineering managers, scrum masters and agile coaches who want research-grounded surveys rather than a blank whiteboard.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

5.0

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, scope change, carryover, cycle time, committed vs delivered) into a collaborative retro board, and the free listing also carries an infinite whiteboard, anonymous team-health pulse checks, timers, and an AI facilitator, alongside templates, anonymous voting, cross-sprint action tracking that can create Jira issues, GIFs, kudos, polls, and icebreakers. Both Marketplace listings are Cloud Fortified. A separate paid Pro app sits alongside the free one.

Full review →

Summary

Echometer scores 5.3 overall and is best for engineering managers and agile coaches who want recurring health-check pulses tied to retros, with EU data residency and a research-flavoured question library. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 5.0 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

Echometer leads on retro toolkit, open platform and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on value, fun factor and AI & insights.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Echometer edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Echometer
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit8.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor5.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade3.5
DetailEchometerSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 1 team, 25 workspace members, unlimited retro guests, 1 retro/month after trial, 2-retro archive per teamFree for unlimited users on a Jira instance (free app listing)
Starting price€29/team/mo$8.40/user/yr (Pro app; free on Jira sites of 10 or fewer users)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people€87/mo billed annually (3 teams × €29 Pro)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2019
HQMünster, GermanyWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residencyGermany
Languages2 (English, German)English only
Export formatsPDF · Markdown · EmailJira
Features4327
Integrations11

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEchometerSprintRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Echometer — pros

  • + 200+ research-grounded health-check items, custom models and automated pulse rotation
  • + Longitudinal team radars, heatmaps and workspace dashboards tied to retros
  • + EU-only data residency (Open Telekom Cloud, Germany) with GDPR DPA
  • + Open actions resurface automatically in the next retro, with email reminders to owners
  • + Per-team pricing — €87/mo covers three teams of eight, billed annually

Echometer — cons

  • Thin integrations — Jira and calendar sync only; no Slack, Teams or Confluence
  • No public API or webhooks; export is PDF and Markdown only
  • No SOC 2 — the ISO 27001 certificate covers the datacenter, not Echometer itself
  • Retro-side AI stops at suggesting measures; transcript coaching is a separately-priced 1:1 product
  • No scheduled or recurring retros — you copy a past format and start each session manually

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free for unlimited users on your Jira instance — the paid Pro app is optional, not the entry point
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, scope change, carryover, cycle time, committed vs delivered) into the retro itself
  • + Strong action loop: unfinished actions carry into the next retro, get quality-scored, and can be pushed into Jira as issues
  • + <strong>Cloud Fortified</strong> on the Atlassian Marketplace — bug bounty, reliability SLOs, and a one-business-day response commitment on critical tickets
  • + Built on Forge: no separate login, and the vendor states no third-party API calls or external data sharing

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — every participant needs a Jira licence, and there's no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, or standalone web app
  • <em>No board export at all</em> — no PDF, CSV, or image download; the only data that leaves is a Jira issue
  • No async mode, presentation mode, drag-and-drop grouping, or scheduled/recurring retros
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own — the trust centre shows framework logos with no status label and no attestation report behind them; no SCIM, audit logs, or cross-team reporting either
  • Free-versus-Pro split is undocumented: both Marketplace listings advertise the same feature set, and Pro is never mentioned on sprintretro.co

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.