Retrospective Tools

Retrium vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrium logo

Retrium

5.0

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool built around a guided five-phase facilitation flow, anonymous brainstorming, dot voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks. Since August 2026 the vendor has also run Retrium Next, a separate free open beta that rebuilds the retro around an AI co-facilitator.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

4.4

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool: the team drops notes into a Slack channel or the web app all sprint long, then runs the retro on a live synced board with drag-to-group, dot voting, a shared timer and assignable action items that carry over to the next retro. The CarrotIQ AI layer is gated to the $40/team/month Pro AI plan. Four-person vendor, Slack is the only integration, and there is still no public changelog.

Full review →

Summary

Retrium scores 5.0 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

Retro Rabbit scores 4.4 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want retro notes captured continuously through the sprint and a lightweight live or async board — and that don't need Jira, health checks or a procurement checklist. It offers paid plans from $30/team/mo.

Retrium leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, integrations and enterprise-grade. Retro Rabbit leads on value, fun factor, AI & insights and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Retrium edges ahead with an overall score of 5.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights2.5
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailRetriumRetro Rabbit
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierNoNo
Free limitNo free plan — 30-day trial of column-based techniques and Team Radar14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$39/mo$30/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$117/mo$90/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2014
HQWashington, D.C., USABoston, United States
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · JiraCSV · Excel · PDF
Features3024
Integrations21

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetriumRetro Rabbit
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Health Checks
Action tracking
Async modenote
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Polling
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clusteringnotenote
AI action itemsnotenote
AI Summariesnote
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistantnote
Action dashboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow — think, group, vote, discuss, wrap-up
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design, with a documented Fishbone root-cause format
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar health check — ten prebuilt radars plus a custom-spoke template, anonymous 1–5 scoring
  • + Per-team-room pricing at <strong>$39/mo</strong> with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free plan — 30-day trial only, and the Fishbone technique and SSO are excluded from it
  • Integrations stop at Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app — no Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
  • AI exists only in <strong>Retrium Next</strong>, a separate free open beta with no data migration, no uptime commitment and no pricing yet — the product you actually pay for has none
  • The only API is an Enterprise-gated SCIM 2.0 user-provisioning endpoint; no webhooks, and export stops at CSV, TXT and send-to-Jira
  • The shipping product has published no release notes since <strong>August 2024</strong>, and the Continuous Improvement Journey beta closed in December 2023

Retro Rabbit — pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first capture — notes land in the channel throughout the sprint, so the board opens full instead of starting with silent writing
  • + Board covers the basics properly: drag-to-group with editable group names, dot voting with a configurable 1–50 vote budget, a shared pause/resume timer, and a per-user anonymity toggle
  • + Action items carry forward — a dedicated <em>Old / Unresolved Items</em> tab plus per-room and per-person trackers, with Slack reminders to assignees
  • + A GIPHY picker on notes that the marketing site never mentions — the one bit of levity on an otherwise plain board
  • + Flat $30/team/month with unlimited users (3 teams of 8 = $90/mo), and CSV/XLSX/PDF export on every tier including Starter

Retro Rabbit — cons

  • Slack is the only integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps, and no public API, webhooks or MCP
  • No health checks, team radars or sentiment tracking; the only longitudinal view is a notes-per-day bar chart per room
  • AI is two calls — a per-retro summary and one action-item suggestion. The site's <em>intelligent note grouping</em> claim has no counterpart in the shipped web app
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO/SAML is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no SOC 2 of its own, the privacy policy carries no GDPR or CCPA commitments, and the Slack Marketplace listing records <em>has a dedicated security team: no</em>
  • No free tier and no public changelog, from a four-person vendor whose marketing site has not changed since early 2025

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.