Retrospective Tools

Mural vs RetroTeam

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Mural logo

Mural

6.4

Visual collaboration whiteboard with hundreds of retro templates and AI-assisted facilitation

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timers, private mode, hundreds of retro templates, AI clustering and summary, and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode) that's been refined for over a decade. Strong enterprise posture with SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and EU/US data residency.

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

5.3

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →

Summary

Mural scores 6.4 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

RetroTeam scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Mural leads on fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on ease of use, value and AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Mural edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Mural
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.5
Enterprise-grade 9.0
RetroTeam
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 6.5
Integrations 2.5
Enterprise-grade 1.5
Detail Mural RetroTeam
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 active murals, unlimited members and visitors, 200+ templates 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits
Starting price $9.99/user/mo $10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $240/mo billed annually $30/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2011 2022
HQ San Francisco, US
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages 9 (English, Spanish, German, …) English only
Features 37 16
Integrations 6 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Mural RetroTeam
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode — refined over 10+ years
  • + Strong template library with 200+ retro and workshop frames
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, EU/US residency
  • + Two-way Jira and Azure DevOps sync turns sticky notes into tracked issues
  • + Polished UX, especially for facilitators running synchronous workshops

Mural — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • AI clustering and summary trail Miro and dedicated retro tools in depth
  • SSO/SAML gated to Business tier ($17.99/user/mo) — same trap as Miro

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through March 2026

RetroTeam — cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates and no custom-template builder advertised
← All comparisons