Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Mural

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.2

Lucid Software's whiteboard with AI co-creation, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, AI sticky-note clustering and summary, and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA-eligible deployments.

Full review →
Mural logo

Mural

6.4

Visual collaboration whiteboard with hundreds of retro templates and AI-assisted facilitation

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timers, private mode, hundreds of retro templates, AI clustering and summary, and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode) that's been refined for over a decade. Strong enterprise posture with SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and EU/US data residency.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.2 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Mural scores 6.4 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

Mural leads on retro toolkit, fun factor and integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Mural edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 9.0
Mural
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.5
Enterprise-grade 9.0
Detail Lucidspark Mural
Category Whiteboard Whiteboard
Team size Mid-market Mid-market
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day 3 active murals, unlimited members and visitors, 200+ templates
Starting price $7.95/user/mo $9.99/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $216/mo billed annually $240/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2010 2011
HQ South Jordan, US San Francisco, US
Data residency United States · European Union United States · European Union
Languages 10 (English, Spanish, German, …) 9 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Features 36 37
Integrations 6 6

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Lucidspark Mural
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note note
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA-eligible, SSO/SAML, SCIM
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI features lag Miro and FigJam — clustering and summary are present but not as polished
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode — refined over 10+ years
  • + Strong template library with 200+ retro and workshop frames
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, EU/US residency
  • + Two-way Jira and Azure DevOps sync turns sticky notes into tracked issues
  • + Polished UX, especially for facilitators running synchronous workshops

Mural — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • AI clustering and summary trail Miro and dedicated retro tools in depth
  • SSO/SAML gated to Business tier ($17.99/user/mo) — same trap as Miro
← All comparisons