Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.2

Lucid Software's whiteboard with AI co-creation, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, AI sticky-note clustering and summary, and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA-eligible deployments.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.3

Fun, engaging retrospectives your team will love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It targets small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.2 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.3 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark leads on AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 9.0
TeleRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 3.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail Lucidspark TeleRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, limited AI Bot access
Starting price $7.95/user/mo £26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $216/mo billed annually £78/mo (~$98/mo)
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2010 2020
HQ South Jordan, US UK
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages 10 (English, Spanish, German, …) 14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Features 36 32
Integrations 6 3

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Lucidspark TeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA-eligible, SSO/SAML, SCIM
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI features lag Miro and FigJam — clustering and summary are present but not as polished
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

TeleRetro — pros

  • + Standout engagement features — animated GIF reactions and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Async mode lets distributed teams contribute before the live session
  • + Action carry-over keeps previous items visible so nothing gets lost between sprints
  • + Generous free tier — unlimited retros for small teams with no credit card required

TeleRetro — cons

  • No native health-check or longitudinal pulse module
  • AI limited to a beta board-summary feature — no grouping, action extraction or sentiment
  • Integration set is narrow — no Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No SCIM, audit logs or advanced enterprise controls; SSO gated to higher plans
  • No cross-team reporting or org-level dashboards
← All comparisons