Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.2

Lucid Software's whiteboard with AI co-creation, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, AI sticky-note clustering and summary, and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA-eligible deployments.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.7

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.2 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.7 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 9.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Lucidspark TeamRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $7.95/user/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $216/mo billed annually $50/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2010 2017
HQ South Jordan, US Australia
Data residency United States · European Union United States · European Union
Languages 10 (English, Spanish, German, …) 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features 36 63
Integrations 6 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Lucidspark TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA-eligible, SSO/SAML, SCIM
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI features lag Miro and FigJam — clustering and summary are present but not as polished
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons