Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.2

Lucid Software's whiteboard with AI co-creation, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, AI sticky-note clustering and summary, and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA-eligible deployments.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.6

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free <strong>Atlassian Forge</strong> app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board with templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIF reactions, kudos, polls, and icebreakers.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.2 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 4.6 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark leads on AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on ease of use and value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 9.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
Detail Lucidspark SprintRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day Free for unlimited users on a Jira instance
Starting price $7.95/user/mo Free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $216/mo billed annually Free (within free tier)
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2010
HQ South Jordan, US Waterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages 10 (English, Spanish, German, …) English only
Features 36 14
Integrations 6 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Lucidspark SprintRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA-eligible, SSO/SAML, SCIM
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI features lag Miro and FigJam — clustering and summary are present but not as polished
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up
  • + Covers the engagement basics: templates, voting, action items, GIFs, polls, kudos, icebreakers

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • No AI features (no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action extraction)
  • No timer, drag-and-drop grouping, async mode, presentation mode, or scheduling
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025) with a small install base — fine for one team, less proven at scale
← All comparisons