Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.2

Lucid Software's whiteboard with AI co-creation, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, AI sticky-note clustering and summary, and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA-eligible deployments.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

6.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI-powered feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and team feedback into themes, sentiment metrics and prioritised action items for engineering leaders.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.2 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke scores 6.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI to surface themes and impact across many retros. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark leads on fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 6.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 9.0
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail Lucidspark ScatterSpoke
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Mid-market
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day 1 team, 10 users, unlimited retros, 20 AI reports/month, 90-day history
Starting price $7.95/user/mo $50/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $216/mo billed annually $50/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2010 2014
HQ South Jordan, US USA
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages 10 (English, Spanish, German, …) English only
Features 36 29
Integrations 6 3

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Lucidspark ScatterSpoke
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA-eligible, SSO/SAML, SCIM
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI features lag Miro and FigJam — clustering and summary are present but not as polished
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + AI themes, sentiment scoring and impact analysis across retros
  • + 20+ retro formats plus custom formats with real-time collaboration
  • + Cross-team goals, metrics and executive-style rollups
  • + Action items sync to Jira; standups and async feedback included

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • Integration coverage is narrow (Jira, Slack, Teams only)
  • No native health checks, team radars or mood tracking
  • Tier-based pricing jumps sharply ($0 to $50 to $500/mo)
  • SAML and SCIM gated to Business/Enterprise tiers
← All comparisons