Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

6.7

Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.7

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 6.7 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.7 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

FigJam leads on fun factor. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, AI & insights and integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail FigJam TeamRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit Unlimited FigJam files on Starter, 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $3/user/mo (Collab seat) $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $120/mo $50/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2012 2017
HQ San Francisco, US Australia
Data residency United States United States · European Union
Languages English only 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features 37 63
Integrations 6 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability FigJam TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

FigJam — pros

  • + Generous free tier with real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) baked in
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
  • + AI clustering, summary and template suggestions are well integrated
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
  • No Microsoft Teams or Azure DevOps integration
  • Pricing is per-seat across Figma plans — paying for a full editor seat ($16+/mo) just to host retros is expensive
  • Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons