Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs GoRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

6.7

Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.

Full review →
GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.8

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 6.7 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/mo.

FigJam leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. GoRetro leads on ease of use and retro toolkit.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 6.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
GoRetro
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 6.5
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 3.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail FigJam GoRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit Unlimited FigJam files on Starter, 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates 30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card required
Starting price $3/user/mo (Collab seat) $29/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $120/mo $147/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2012 2020
HQ San Francisco, US Israel
Data residency United States
Languages English only English only
Features 37 34
Integrations 6 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability FigJam GoRetro
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights note
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

FigJam — pros

  • + Generous free tier with real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) baked in
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
  • + AI clustering, summary and template suggestions are well integrated
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
  • No Microsoft Teams or Azure DevOps integration
  • Pricing is per-seat across Figma plans — paying for a full editor seat ($16+/mo) just to host retros is expensive
  • Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros

GoRetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — cons

  • Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
  • Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No async mode, no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
  • Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin
← All comparisons